Vendor profile

TestFort

Rank and overall score: #5, 53.0 of 100
Cases by grade: A 0, B 6, C 24
Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
Headcount range: 50-249 source
QA-only company: no, also sells other services source
Verified on: 2026-11-12

TestFort has 30 verified automation cases on file. Its highest dimension is Framework depth at 10 of 10.

Not ideal for

Framework migration projects
0 of 30 verified cases are tagged as a migration between frameworks. Case set on this page. Source: testfort-1
Buyers who need baselined, measured outcomes
0 of 30 verified cases reach grade A (named client plus a metric with baseline and method). Case set on this page. Source: testfort-1

Case files by framework

A case with grade A or B has its own case file. Grade C cases link to the vendor source. A case naming two frameworks appears under both.

Playwright 1

Client	Industry	Year	Grade	Metric kinds	Case
anonymous client	Architecture and construction technology	n/d	grade C, claim only	defects, coverage, execution-time, release-frequency	testfort-7

Cypress 2

Client	Industry	Year	Grade	Metric kinds	Case
anonymous client	Healthcare (clinical research document management)	n/d	grade C, claim only	suite-size, other, cost, defects	testfort-1
anonymous client	Drone inspection software	n/d	grade C, claim only	none	testfort-21

Selenium WebDriver 15

Client	Industry	Year	Grade	Metric kinds	Case
anonymous client	Healthcare (clinical research document management)	n/d	grade C, claim only	suite-size, other, cost, defects	testfort-1
anonymous client	Gaming (multiplayer PVP)	n/d	grade C, claim only	defects, cost	testfort-11
anonymous client	Automotive manufacturing	n/d	grade C, claim only	suite-size, coverage	testfort-12
anonymous client	Technology (CI/CD platform)	n/d	grade B, partial	other, defects, suite-size	testfort-15
anonymous client	Media (audio streaming)	n/d	grade C, claim only	suite-size, coverage, other	testfort-22
anonymous client	Developer tools (data visualization)	n/d	grade C, claim only	other	testfort-23
anonymous client	Banking and financial services	n/d	grade C, claim only	other, defects, coverage	testfort-24
anonymous client	HR technology	n/d	grade C, claim only	other, defects	testfort-27
DreamLine	eCommerce (shower products manufacturer)	n/d	grade B, partial	other	testfort-3
anonymous client	Healthcare (in-home senior care)	n/d	grade C, claim only	other, defects, coverage	testfort-30
MyFitnessPal	Health and fitness app	n/d	grade B, partial	none	testfort-4
Skype	Communications	n/d	grade B, partial	other	testfort-5
anonymous client	Media & Entertainment (digital asset management software)	n/d	grade C, claim only	suite-size, defects	testfort-6
anonymous client	Online training (virtual training labs)	n/d	grade B, partial	suite-size, coverage, other	testfort-8
anonymous client	Print-on-demand eCommerce	n/d	grade C, claim only	suite-size, coverage, cost, defects	testfort-9

Appium 4

Client	Industry	Year	Grade	Metric kinds	Case
anonymous client	Gaming (social mobile games)	n/d	grade C, claim only	cost, release-frequency, other	testfort-10
anonymous client	Gaming (multiplayer PVP)	n/d	grade C, claim only	defects, cost	testfort-11
anonymous client	Fitness technology (wearables)	n/d	grade C, claim only	defects, execution-time, other	testfort-28
anonymous client	Print-on-demand eCommerce	n/d	grade C, claim only	suite-size, coverage, cost, defects	testfort-9

Espresso and XCUITest 1

Client	Industry	Year	Grade	Metric kinds	Case
anonymous client	Print-on-demand eCommerce	n/d	grade C, claim only	suite-size, coverage, cost, defects	testfort-9

REST Assured 1

Client	Industry	Year	Grade	Metric kinds	Case
anonymous client	Online training (virtual training labs)	n/d	grade B, partial	suite-size, coverage, other	testfort-8

Postman and Newman 17

Client	Industry	Year	Grade	Metric kinds	Case
anonymous client	Gaming (social mobile games)	n/d	grade C, claim only	cost, release-frequency, other	testfort-10
anonymous client	SaaS (B2B sales enablement)	n/d	grade C, claim only	other, cost, suite-size	testfort-13
anonymous client	eCommerce (online retail)	n/d	grade C, claim only	defects, other, cost	testfort-14
anonymous client	Technology (CI/CD platform)	n/d	grade B, partial	other, defects, suite-size	testfort-15
anonymous client	SaaS (database management and observability)	n/d	grade C, claim only	other, defects	testfort-16
anonymous client	Nonprofit (charity fundraising platform)	n/d	grade C, claim only	defects, release-frequency, other, coverage	testfort-17
anonymous client	eCommerce (marketplace API)	n/d	grade C, claim only	suite-size	testfort-18
anonymous client	Fintech (B2B payments)	n/d	grade C, claim only	defects, coverage	testfort-19
anonymous client	Hardware (wireless connectivity)	n/d	grade C, claim only	suite-size, defects, coverage	testfort-20
anonymous client	Media (audio streaming)	n/d	grade C, claim only	suite-size, coverage, other	testfort-22
anonymous client	Developer tools (data visualization)	n/d	grade C, claim only	other	testfort-23
anonymous client	Travel (flight booking)	n/d	grade C, claim only	defects, release-frequency, other	testfort-25
anonymous client	HR technology	n/d	grade C, claim only	other, defects	testfort-27
anonymous client	Fitness technology (wearables)	n/d	grade C, claim only	defects, execution-time, other	testfort-28
anonymous client	Fintech (crypto portfolio management)	n/d	grade C, claim only	other, release-frequency, defects	testfort-29
anonymous client	Media & Entertainment (digital asset management software)	n/d	grade C, claim only	suite-size, defects	testfort-6
anonymous client	Print-on-demand eCommerce	n/d	grade C, claim only	suite-size, coverage, cost, defects	testfort-9

Grafana k6 2

Client	Industry	Year	Grade	Metric kinds	Case
LuxiEdge	Technology (GPU compute engine)	n/d	grade B, partial	other	testfort-2
anonymous client	Media & Entertainment (digital asset management software)	n/d	grade C, claim only	suite-size, defects	testfort-6

Apache JMeter 9

Client	Industry	Year	Grade	Metric kinds	Case
anonymous client	Gaming (multiplayer PVP)	n/d	grade C, claim only	defects, cost	testfort-11
anonymous client	Technology (CI/CD platform)	n/d	grade B, partial	other, defects, suite-size	testfort-15
anonymous client	SaaS (database management and observability)	n/d	grade C, claim only	other, defects	testfort-16
LuxiEdge	Technology (GPU compute engine)	n/d	grade B, partial	other	testfort-2
anonymous client	Developer tools (data visualization)	n/d	grade C, claim only	other	testfort-23
anonymous client	Cryptocurrency exchange	n/d	grade C, claim only	coverage, other	testfort-26
anonymous client	HR technology	n/d	grade C, claim only	other, defects	testfort-27
DreamLine	eCommerce (shower products manufacturer)	n/d	grade B, partial	other	testfort-3
anonymous client	Architecture and construction technology	n/d	grade C, claim only	defects, coverage, execution-time, release-frequency	testfort-7

Cucumber, SpecFlow, Behave 1

Client	Industry	Year	Grade	Metric kinds	Case
anonymous client	Gaming (social mobile games)	n/d	grade C, claim only	cost, release-frequency, other	testfort-10

Eight dimensions

Overall score = sum of each dimension score divided by 10 and multiplied by its weight. Outcome verifiability counts metrics with a stated baseline and method.

1. Case volume and specificity (weight 20)9 / 10

Measured: 10.8 weighted cases. 30 verified cases: A 0, B 6, C 24, weighted 1.0, 0.6 and 0.3.

Records: testfort-1, testfort-2, testfort-3, testfort-4, testfort-5, testfort-6, testfort-7, testfort-8, testfort-9, testfort-10, testfort-11, testfort-12, testfort-13, testfort-14, testfort-15, testfort-16, testfort-17, testfort-18, testfort-19, testfort-20, testfort-21, testfort-22, testfort-23, testfort-24 and 6 more

2. Framework breadth (weight 10)8 / 10

Measured: 5 frameworks. Frameworks with at least one A or B case: Apache JMeter, Grafana k6, Selenium WebDriver, REST Assured, Postman and Newman.

Records: testfort-2, testfort-3, testfort-15, testfort-4, testfort-5, testfort-8

3. Framework depth (weight 15)10 / 10

Measured: 17 cases on Postman and Newman. Most cases on a single framework: Postman and Newman.

Records: testfort-6, testfort-9, testfort-10, testfort-13, testfort-14, testfort-15, testfort-16, testfort-17, testfort-18, testfort-19, testfort-20, testfort-22, testfort-23, testfort-25, testfort-27, testfort-28, testfort-29

4. Migration evidence (weight 10)0 / 10

Measured: 0 migration cases with before and after. 0 cases tagged as migration; 0 state a before and an after value.

5. Outcome verifiability (weight 15)1 / 10

Measured: 1 of 108 metrics. 1 of 108 published metrics state both a baseline and a method.

Records: testfort-8

6. Third-party review signal (weight 10)0 / 10

Measured: 0 reviews naming a framework. No verified review within 60 months names a listed framework.

7. Public engineering output (weight 10)3 / 10

Measured: 2 items. Dated posts, talks or repositories by staff about a listed framework within 36 months.

Records: ev-testfort-004, ev-testfort-005

8. Transparency (weight 10)7.5 / 10

Measured: 3 of 4 items. Disclosed: public rate, QA process page, delivery locations. Not found: named leadership with profiles.

Records: ev-testfort-001, ev-testfort-003

baseline:: The measured value before the work started, against which a later value is compared. source

Framework matrix

Framework	B	C	Total
Playwright	0	1	1
Cypress	0	2	2
Selenium WebDriver	5	10	15
WebdriverIO	0	0	0, no case
TestCafe	0	0	0, no case
Puppeteer	0	0	0, no case
Robot Framework	0	0	0, no case
Appium	0	4	4
Detox	0	0	0, no case
Espresso and XCUITest	0	1	1
REST Assured	1	0	1
Postman and Newman	1	16	17
Karate	0	0	0, no case
Grafana k6	1	1	2
Apache JMeter	3	6	9
Gatling	0	0	0, no case
Locust	0	0	0, no case
Cucumber, SpecFlow, Behave	0	1	1

Migrations evidenced

0 of 30 verified cases describe moving a suite from one framework to another.

Reviews naming frameworks and engineering output

Verified reviews naming a listed framework

No verified review naming a listed framework was found on Clutch, GoodFirms or G2.

Engineering output, last 36 months

2026-10-19:: engineering-post, Appium, by Inna Martyniuk. ev-testfort-005
2026-09-22:: engineering-post, Cucumber, SpecFlow, Behave, by Inna Martyniuk. ev-testfort-004

Transparency

Public rate: $25-$49 per hour source
Leadership: Max Zorian, Founder and CEO ; Oleg Sivograkov, Chief Operating Officer ; Bruce Mason, Delivery Director
QA process page: process page
Delivery locations: London, United Kingdom source; Sheridan, Wyoming, United States source

Scores and grades describe published evidence as of the verifiedOn date on each item. They do not measure service quality. Verify with the vendor before contracting.