Vendor profile

TestDevLab

Rank and overall score: #12, 35.0 of 100
Cases by grade: A 0, B 4, C 0
Headquarters: Riga, Latvia
Headcount range: 500+ source
QA-only company: no, also sells other services source
Verified on: 2026-11-12

TestDevLab has 4 verified automation cases on file. Its highest dimension is Framework breadth at 8 of 10.

Not ideal for

Performance and load testing shortlists
0 of 4 verified cases name k6, JMeter, Gatling or Locust. Case set on this page. Source: testdevlab-1
Buyers who need proof of engagements over 12 months
0 of 4 verified cases disclose a duration over 12 months. Case set on this page. Source: testdevlab-1
Framework migration projects
0 of 4 verified cases are tagged as a migration between frameworks. Case set on this page. Source: testdevlab-1

Case files by framework

A case with grade A or B has its own case file. Grade C cases link to the vendor source. A case naming two frameworks appears under both.

Playwright 1

Client	Industry	Year	Grade	Metric kinds	Case
ConSynSys Technologies	Industrial manufacturing software	n/d	grade B, partial	none	testdevlab-2

Cypress 1

Client	Industry	Year	Grade	Metric kinds	Case
UJET	Cloud customer support software	n/d	grade B, partial	none	testdevlab-3

Selenium WebDriver 2

Client	Industry	Year	Grade	Metric kinds	Case
BTA Baltic Insurance Company	Insurance	n/d	grade B, partial	none	testdevlab-1
i-Hub	Fintech (KYC and AML compliance)	n/d	grade B, partial	none	testdevlab-4

Appium 2

Client	Industry	Year	Grade	Metric kinds	Case
BTA Baltic Insurance Company	Insurance	n/d	grade B, partial	none	testdevlab-1
UJET	Cloud customer support software	n/d	grade B, partial	none	testdevlab-3

REST Assured 1

Client	Industry	Year	Grade	Metric kinds	Case
i-Hub	Fintech (KYC and AML compliance)	n/d	grade B, partial	none	testdevlab-4

Cucumber, SpecFlow, Behave 3

Client	Industry	Year	Grade	Metric kinds	Case
ConSynSys Technologies	Industrial manufacturing software	n/d	grade B, partial	none	testdevlab-2
UJET	Cloud customer support software	n/d	grade B, partial	none	testdevlab-3
i-Hub	Fintech (KYC and AML compliance)	n/d	grade B, partial	none	testdevlab-4

Eight dimensions

Overall score = sum of each dimension score divided by 10 and multiplied by its weight. Outcome verifiability counts metrics with a stated baseline and method.

1. Case volume and specificity (weight 20)5 / 10

Measured: 2.4 weighted cases. 4 verified cases: A 0, B 4, C 0, weighted 1.0, 0.6 and 0.3.

Records: testdevlab-1, testdevlab-2, testdevlab-3, testdevlab-4

2. Framework breadth (weight 10)8 / 10

Measured: 6 frameworks. Frameworks with at least one A or B case: Selenium WebDriver, Appium, Playwright, Cucumber, SpecFlow, Behave, Cypress, REST Assured.

Records: testdevlab-1, testdevlab-4, testdevlab-3, testdevlab-2

3. Framework depth (weight 15)6 / 10

Measured: 3 cases on Cucumber, SpecFlow, Behave. Most cases on a single framework: Cucumber, SpecFlow, Behave.

Records: testdevlab-2, testdevlab-3, testdevlab-4

4. Migration evidence (weight 10)0 / 10

Measured: 0 migration cases with before and after. 0 cases tagged as migration; 0 state a before and an after value.

5. Outcome verifiability (weight 15)0 / 10

Measured: 0 metrics. The verified cases publish no metric.

6. Third-party review signal (weight 10)0 / 10

Measured: 0 reviews naming a framework. No verified review within 60 months names a listed framework.

7. Public engineering output (weight 10)3 / 10

Measured: 3 items. Dated posts, talks or repositories by staff about a listed framework within 36 months.

Records: ev-testdevlab-004, ev-testdevlab-005, ev-testdevlab-006

8. Transparency (weight 10)5 / 10

Measured: 2 of 4 items. Disclosed: QA process page, delivery locations. Not found: public rate, named leadership with profiles.

Records: ev-testdevlab-003, ev-testdevlab-001

baseline:: The measured value before the work started, against which a later value is compared. source

Framework matrix

Framework	B	Total
Playwright	1	1
Cypress	1	1
Selenium WebDriver	2	2
WebdriverIO	0	0, no case
TestCafe	0	0, no case
Puppeteer	0	0, no case
Robot Framework	0	0, no case
Appium	2	2
Detox	0	0, no case
Espresso and XCUITest	0	0, no case
REST Assured	1	1
Postman and Newman	0	0, no case
Karate	0	0, no case
Grafana k6	0	0, no case
Apache JMeter	0	0, no case
Gatling	0	0, no case
Locust	0	0, no case
Cucumber, SpecFlow, Behave	3	3

Migrations evidenced

0 of 4 verified cases describe moving a suite from one framework to another.

Reviews naming frameworks and engineering output

Verified reviews naming a listed framework

No verified review naming a listed framework was found on Clutch, GoodFirms or G2.

Engineering output, last 36 months

2026-10-08:: repository, Appium, by alvarolaserna. ev-testdevlab-006
2026-07-30:: repository, Appium, by alvarolaserna. ev-testdevlab-004
2026-04-08:: repository, Selenium WebDriver, by TDL-EdgarsEglitis. ev-testdevlab-005

Transparency

Public rate: not published
Leadership: Ervins Grīnfelds, co-CEO ; Andrejs Frišfelds, co-CEO ; Vytautas Mereckis, COO ; Mārcis Kupfers, CFO ; Kristaps Freimanis, Director of Functional Testing ; Alvaro Laserna Lopez, Director of R&D and Test Automation
QA process page: process page
Delivery locations: Riga, Latvia source; Ventspils, Latvia source; Liepaja, Latvia source; Daugavpils, Latvia source; Malaga, Spain source; North Macedonia source

Scores and grades describe published evidence as of the verifiedOn date on each item. They do not measure service quality. Verify with the vendor before contracting.