Case file deviqa-5
QA services for production music library
grade B, partial Named client; no metric states both a baseline and a method.
Claim ledger
Each row quotes the vendor. A row is a claim, and it counts toward outcome verifiability only when the source states the baseline and the measurement method.
| Kind | Vendor claim (quoted) | Before | After | Baseline | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| execution-time | “30 minutes to execute automated smoke testing” (grade B, baseline yes) | >3 hours to execute manual smoke testing | ~30 minutes | yes | no |
| execution-time | “2 minutes to create test data for specific test scenarios via JS and Cypress” (grade B, baseline yes) | ~3 hours to create test data for specific test scenarios | 2 minutes | yes | no |
| coverage | “20% of the regression tests automated” (grade B, baseline yes) | No automation testing | 20% of the regression tests | yes | no |
| suite-size | “75+ E2E automation tests developed” (grade B, baseline yes) | No automation testing | 75+ E2E automation tests | yes | no |
| other | “>900 test cases are up to date and integrated into the workflow” (grade B, baseline yes) | ~90% of test cases were outdated | >900 test cases are up to date | yes | no |
| coverage | “100% of the smoke tests automated” (grade B, baseline yes) | No automation testing | 100% of the smoke tests | yes | no |
| suite-size | “2 load test suites implemented” (grade B, baseline yes) | No load tests | 2 load test suites | yes | no |
| suite-size | “10+ semi-automated performance tests based on the WebPageTest service” (grade B, baseline yes) | No performance testing | 10+ semi-automated performance tests | yes | no |
| other | “119 deployments followed by automated smoke testing + manual sanity testing” (grade B, baseline yes) | Smoke testing wasn’t the part of a workflow | 119 deployments | yes | no |
- baseline:
- The measured value before the work started, against which a later value is compared. source
Engagement facts
- Client
- APM Music stated
- Industry
- Media (production music library) stated
- Client type
- not disclosed
- Frameworks
- Cypress, Postman and Newman and Apache JMeter stated
- Languages
- JavaScript stated
- CI tools
- not disclosed
- Device or browser clouds
- BrowserStack stated
- Team size
- 3 stated
- Duration in months
- not disclosed
- Start year
- 2022 stated
- Publication date
- not disclosed
What this case does not tell you
- Client type
- CI tools
- Duration in months
- Publication date
- How or over what period any metric was measured
Source
QA services for production music library (deviqa.com)
accessed 2026-11-11, verified 2026-11-11
Related pages
- DeviQA: vendor profile and score
- Cypress: vendors with published cases
- Postman and Newman: vendors with published cases
- Apache JMeter: vendors with published cases
- a1qa: a1qa enhances software quality of Acronis’ multiuse infrastructure product for cybersecurity
- a1qa: Helping a developer of an advertising technology deliver high-quality software
- All case files
- Framework index
- Vendor ranking
- How cases are graded A, B, C or X
- Corrections and regrades log
Scores and grades describe published evidence as of the verifiedOn date on each item. They do not measure service quality. Verify with the vendor before contracting.