Skip to content
Test Automation Vendors / 263 cases

Case file deviqa-36

QA for an art management and sales platform

grade B, partial Anonymous client with a metric that states its baseline.

Claim ledger

Each row quotes the vendor. A row is a claim, and it counts toward outcome verifiability only when the source states the baseline and the measurement method.

KindVendor claim (quoted)BeforeAfterBaselineMethod
release-frequency“Release velocity increased by 30%” (grade B, baseline no)not statedincreased by 30%nono
execution-time“Overall testing time decreased by 40%” (grade B, baseline no)not stateddecreased by 40%nono
execution-time“Test execution time decreased by 35%” (grade B, baseline no)not stateddecreased by 35%nono
other“100% of reports include screenshots or videos” (grade B, baseline yes)Bug reports often lacked sufficient context100% of reportsyesno
baseline:
The measured value before the work started, against which a later value is compared. source

Engagement facts

Client
not disclosed
Industry
Art management and sales stated
Client type
not disclosed
Frameworks
Postman and Newman stated
Languages
not disclosed
CI tools
not disclosed
Device or browser clouds
not disclosed
Team size
1 stated
Duration in months
not disclosed
Start year
2023 stated
Publication date
not disclosed

What this case does not tell you

  • Client
  • Client type
  • Languages
  • CI tools
  • Device or browser clouds
  • Duration in months
  • Publication date
  • How or over what period any metric was measured

Source

QA for an art management and sales platform (deviqa.com)

accessed 2026-11-11, verified 2026-11-11

Scores and grades describe published evidence as of the verifiedOn date on each item. They do not measure service quality. Verify with the vendor before contracting.