Skip to content
Test Automation Vendors / 263 cases

Case file deviqa-27

QA services for employee wellness platform

grade B, partial Named client; no metric states both a baseline and a method.

Historical: older than 60 months, counted at half weight in case volume

Claim ledger

Each row quotes the vendor. A row is a claim, and it counts toward outcome verifiability only when the source states the baseline and the measurement method.

KindVendor claim (quoted)BeforeAfterBaselineMethod
defects“Defects appearing after updates to the core system decreased by 95%” (grade B, baseline no)not stateddecreased by 95%nono
execution-time“Testing and release cycles became 3× faster” (grade B, baseline no)not stated3x fasternono
suite-size“The team created more than 3,800 automated test scripts” (grade B, baseline no)not statedmore than 3,800nono
coverage“>90% of test cases are automated” (grade B, baseline yes)Only smoke tests were automated on BE>90% of test casesyesno
coverage“~99% of smoke tests are automated” (grade B, baseline yes)Manual smoke testing on FE~99% of smoke testsyesno
baseline:
The measured value before the work started, against which a later value is compared. source

Engagement facts

Client
GoodShape stated
Industry
Workforce well-being software stated
Client type
not disclosed
Frameworks
Robot Framework stated
Languages
Python, JavaScript stated
CI tools
Jenkins stated
Device or browser clouds
BrowserStack stated
Team size
3 stated
Duration in months
not disclosed
Start year
2019 stated
Publication date
not disclosed

What this case does not tell you

  • Client type
  • Duration in months
  • Publication date
  • How or over what period any metric was measured

Source

QA services for employee wellness platform (deviqa.com)

accessed 2026-11-11, verified 2026-11-11

Scores and grades describe published evidence as of the verifiedOn date on each item. They do not measure service quality. Verify with the vendor before contracting.