Skip to content
Test Automation Vendors / 263 cases

Case file a1qa-67

Bringing QA expertise to help assure medical device embedded software quality while complying with IEC 62304

grade B, partial Anonymous client with a metric that states its baseline.

Claim ledger

Each row quotes the vendor. A row is a claim, and it counts toward outcome verifiability only when the source states the baseline and the measurement method.

KindVendor claim (quoted)BeforeAfterBaselineMethod
other“a full exploration of all 6 modules took 2 months instead of a year” (grade B, baseline yes)a year2 monthsyesno
defects“helped detect over 90% of high-priority issues” (grade B, baseline no)not statednot statednoyes
defects“7,000 defects detected, with about 2,000 being Major and Critical ones” (grade B, baseline no)not statednot statednoyes
baseline:
The measured value before the work started, against which a later value is compared. source

Engagement facts

Client
not disclosed
Industry
Medical devices (blood component technologies) stated
Client type
enterprise stated
Frameworks
Postman and Newman and Cucumber, SpecFlow, Behave stated
Languages
Java, C# stated
CI tools
GitHub Actions, TFS stated
Device or browser clouds
not disclosed
Team size
10 stated
Duration in months
120 stated
Start year
not disclosed
Publication date
not disclosed

What this case does not tell you

  • Client
  • Device or browser clouds
  • Start year
  • Publication date

Source

Scores and grades describe published evidence as of the verifiedOn date on each item. They do not measure service quality. Verify with the vendor before contracting.